Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foggyland
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:53, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Foggyland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Video game location that is entirely sourced to Wikia and other fan-published Wikis. No sources that can WP:verify notability of this video game location, independent of the video game series itself. Article also violates WP:JUSTPLOT since there is no significant out-of-universe information to make this more than just a plot recap. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:28, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 17:43, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The considerate thing to do then would be to redirect this article into the main EarthBound article. GVnayR (talk) 03:43, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fictional nation that does not meet the general notability guideline and it is a plot-only description of a fictional work. All content fails verifiability since it uses unreliable sources. While the article title is simple and would justify a redirect, the term Foggyland is not used only for the fictional location of a video game (around 88% of results with a search engine test are not related to Earthbound), so a redirect is not justified in my opinion. Jfgslo (talk) 15:19, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.